Stand. Genomic Sci. 2011 5:1
doi:10.4056/sigs.2054696
Complete genome sequence of Staphylothermus hellenicus P8T

Iain Anderson1*, Reinhard Wirth2, Susan Lucas1, Alex Copeland1, Alla Lapidus1, Jan-Fang Cheng1, Lynne Goodwin1,3, Samuel Pitluck1, Karen Davenport1,3, John C. Detter1,3, Cliff Han1,3, Roxanne Tapia1,3, Miriam Land4, Loren Hauser4, Amrita Pati1, Natalia Mikhailova1, Tanja Woyke1, Hans-Peter Klenk5, Nikos Kyrpides1, Natalia Ivanova1

1 DOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, USA
2 University of Regensburg, Microbiology – Archaeenzentrum, Regensburg, Germany
3 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
4 Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
5 DSMZ – German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany

* Corresponding author: IJAnderson@lbl.gov

Electronic publication date: September 23, 2011.

Abstract

Staphylothermus hellenicus belongs to the order Desulfurococcales within the archaeal phylum Crenarchaeota. Strain P8T is the type strain of the species and was isolated from a shallow hydrothermal vent system at Palaeochori Bay, Milos, Greece. It is a hyperthermophilic, anaerobic heterotroph. Here we describe the features of this organism together with the complete genome sequence and annotation. The 1,580,347 bp genome with its 1,668 protein-coding and 48 RNA genes was sequenced as part of a DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) Laboratory Sequencing Program (LSP) project.

Keywords: Archaea, Crenarchaeota, Desulfurococcaceae, hyperthermophile, hydrothermal vent, anaerobe.

Anderson et al.
Introduction

Strain P8T (=DSM 12710 = JCM 10830) is the type strain of the species Staphylothermus hellenicus. It was isolated from a shallow hydrothermal vent at Palaeochori Bay near the island of Milos, Greece [1]. There is one other validly named species in the genus, S. marinus, for which a complete genome sequence has been determined and published [2,3]. The S. hellenicus genome is the ninth to be published from the order Desulfurococcales in the phylum Crenarchaeota. The only other genus in the Desulfurococcales for which two species have been sequenced is Desulfurococcus. Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic position of S. hellenicus with respect to the other species in the order Desulfurococcales.

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1

Phylogenetic tree highlighting the position of S. hellenicus relative to the type strains of the other species within the order Desulfurococcales. The tree was inferred from 1,333 aligned characters [4,5] of the 16S rRNA gene sequence under the maximum likelihood (ML) criterion [6]. Rooting was done initially using the midpoint method [7] and then checked for its agreement with the current classification (Table 1). The branches are scaled in terms of the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers adjacent to the branches are support values from 1,000 ML bootstrap replicates [8] (left) and from 1,000 maximum parsimony bootstrap replicates [9] (right) if larger than 60%. Lineages with type strain genome sequencing projects registered in GOLD [10] are labeled with one asterisk, those listed as 'Complete and Published' with two asterisks.


Organism information

S. hellenicus was isolated from sediment at Palaeochori Bay, Milos, Greece [1]. For isolation, 1 ml of sediment was added to half-strength SME medium [11] with 2% elemental sulfur and incubated at 90°C under H2/CO2. Colonies were isolated on plates with the same medium and with 1% Phytagel and 2-3% sodium alginate added [1]. S. hellenicus is a regular-shaped coccus (Figure 2) which can form large aggregates of up to fifty cells, similar to S. marinus [1,12]. No flagella were observed and cells were nonmotile. The temperature range for growth of S. hellenicus is 70-90°C, with an optimum at 85°C [1]. The salinity range was from 2% to 8% NaCl, and the optimum was 4% NaCl [1]. The pH range for growth was from 4.5 to 7.5. The optimum pH was 6.0 [1]. S. hellenicus is a strict anaerobe, and can grow under H2/CO2 or N2/CO2 [1]. It is a heterotroph which grows well on yeast extract but poorly on peptone [1]. Many carbon sources were tested, but no growth was observed, showing that a complex nutrient source is required [1]. Elemental sulfur was required for growth [1]. The features of the organism are listed in Table 1.

Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2

Scanning electron micrograph of S. hellenicus P8T.


Table 1: Classification and general features of S. hellenicus P8T according to the MIGS recommendations [13]
MIGS ID   Property    Term    Evidence codea
  Current classification    Domain Archaea    TAS [14]
   Phylum Crenarchaeota    TAS [15,16]
   Class Thermoprotei    TAS [16,17]
   Order Desulfurococcales    TAS [16,18]
   Family Desulfurococcaceae    TAS [19-21]
   Genus Staphylothermus    TAS [12,22]
   Species Staphylothermus hellenicus    TAS [1]
   Type strain P8    TAS [1]
  Cell shape    coccus    TAS [1]
  Motility    nonmotile    TAS [1]
  Sporulation    nonsporulating    NAS
  Temperature range    70-90°C    TAS [1]
  Optimum temperature    85°C    TAS [1]
MIGS-6.3   Salinity    2-8% NaCl (optimum 4%)    TAS [1]
MIGS-22   Oxygen requirement    anaerobe    TAS [1]
  Carbon source    yeast extract    TAS [1]
  Energy metabolism    heterotrophic    TAS [1]
MIGS-6   Habitat    marine geothemally heated areas    TAS [1]
MIGS-15   Biotic relationship    free-living    TAS [1]
MIGS-14   Pathogenicity    none    NAS
  Biosafety level    1    NAS
  Isolation    geothermally heated sediment    TAS [1]
MIGS-4   Geographic location    Palaeochori Bay, Milos, Greece    TAS [1]
MIGS-5   Isolation time    September 1996    TAS [1]
MIGS-4.1
MIGS-4.2
  Latitude
  longitude
   36.674
   24.517
   TAS [1]
MIGS-4.3   Depth    4-10 m    TAS [1]
MIGS-4.4   Altitude    not applicable

a) Evidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [23].

Genome sequencing information
Genome project history

This organism was selected for sequencing on the basis of its phylogenetic position and is part of a Laboratory Sequencing Project (LSP) to sequence diverse archaea. The genome project is listed in the Genomes On Line Database [10] and the complete genome sequence has been deposited in GenBank. Sequencing, finishing, and annotation were performed by the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI). A summary of the project information is shown in Table 2.

Table 2: Genome sequencing project information
MIGS ID   Property     Term
MIGS-31   Finishing quality     Finished
MIGS-28   Libraries used     Illumina standard library, 454 standard library, 454 28 kb paired end library
MIGS-29   Sequencing platforms     Illumina GA II, 454 GS FLX Titanium
MIGS-31.2   Sequencing coverage     462× with Illumina, 132× with 454
MIGS-30   Assemblers     Velvet, Newbler, phrap
MIGS-32   Gene calling method     Prodigal, GenePRIMP
  INSDC ID     CP002051
  Genbank Date of Release     June 1, 2010
  GOLD ID     Gc01350
  NCBI project ID     33683
MIGS-13   Source material identifier     DSM 12710
  Project relevance     Phylogenetic diversity, biotechnology
Growth conditions and DNA isolation

S. hellenicus P8T cells were grown in a 300 liter fermenter at 85°C in SME medium [11] with 0.1% yeast extract, 0.1% peptone, and 0.7% elemental sulfur under a 200 kPa N2 atmosphere. DNA was isolated with a Qiagen Genomic 500 DNA Kit.

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of S. hellenicus was sequenced at the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) using a combination of Illumina and 454 technologies. An Illumina GA II shotgun library with reads of 730 Mb, a 454 Titanium draft library with average read length of 310.5 +/- 187.8 bases, and a paired end 454 library with an average insert size of 28 Kb were generated for this genome. Illumina sequencing data was assembled with Velvet [24], and the consensus sequences were shredded into 1.5 kb overlapped fake reads and assembled together with the 454 data with Newbler. Draft assemblies were based on 208 Mb 454 draft data.

The initial Newbler assembly contained 4 contigs in 1 scaffold. We converted the initial 454 assembly into a phrap assembly by making fake reads from the consensus, collecting the read pairs in the 454 paired end library. The Phred/Phrap/Consed software package was used for sequence assembly and quality assessment [25-27] in the following finishing process. After the shotgun stage, reads were assembled with parallel phrap (High Performance Software, LLC). Possible mis-assemblies were corrected with gapResolution (Cliff Han, unpublished), Dupfinisher [28], or sequencing cloned bridging PCR fragments with subcloning or transposon bombing (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, WI). Gaps between contigs were closed by editing in Consed, by PCR and by Bubble PCR primer walks. A total of 23 additional reactions were necessary to close gaps and to raise the quality of the finished sequence.

Genome annotation

Genes were identified using Prodigal [29], followed by a round of manual curation using GenePRIMP [30]. The predicted CDSs were translated and used to search the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nonredundant database, UniProt, TIGRFam, Pfam, PRIAM, KEGG, COG, and InterPro databases. The tRNAScanSE tool [31] was used to find tRNA genes, whereas ribosomal RNAs were found by using BLASTn against the ribosomal RNA databases. The RNA components of the protein secretion complex and the RNase P were identified by searching the genome for the corresponding Rfam profiles using INFERNAL [32]. Additional gene prediction analysis and manual functional annotation was performed within the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) platform [33] developed by the Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA, USA [34].

Genome properties

The genome includes one chromosome and no plasmids, for a total size of 1,580,437 bp (Table 3 and Figure 3). This genome size is close to the average for Desulfurococcales. The GC percentage is 36.8%, which is lower than most of the Desulfurococcales. A total of 1,716 genes were identified: 48 RNA genes and 1,668 protein-coding genes. There are 69 pseudogenes, comprising 4.1% of the protein-coding genes. About 62% of predicted genes begin with ATG, 30% begin with TTG, and 7% begin with GTG. There is one copy of each ribosomal RNA. Table 4 shows the distribution of genes in COG categories.

Table 3: Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome
Attribute   Value   % of totala
Size (bp)   1,580,437   100.0%
G+C content (bp)   582,173   36.8%
Coding region (bp)   1,383,053   87.5%
Number of replicons   1
Extrachromosomal elements   0
Total genes   1,716
RNA genes   48
rRNA operons   1
Protein-coding genes   1,668   100.0%
Pseudogenes   69   4.1%
Genes with function prediction   975   58.5%
Genes in paralog clusters   98   5.9%
Genes assigned to COGs   1,093   65.5%
Genes assigned Pfam domains   1,135   68.0%
Genes with signal peptides   129   7.7%
Genes with transmembrane helices   342   20.5%
CRISPR repeats   3   % of totala

a) The total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 3

Graphical circular map of the chromosome. From outside to the center: Genes on forward strand (colored by COG categories), genes on reverse strand (colored by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs green, rRNAs red, other RNAs black), GC content, and GC skew.


Table 4: Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories
Code   Value    %agea     Description
J   161    9.7     Translation
A   2    0.1     RNA processing and modification
K   59    3.5     Transcription
L   72    4.3     Replication, recombination and repair
B   2    0.1     Chromatin structure and dynamics
D   7    0.4     Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y   0    0.0     Nuclear structure
V   18    1.1     Defense mechanisms
T   20    1.2     Signal transduction mechanisms
M   39    2.3     Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N   4    0.2     Cell motility
Z   0    0.0     Cytoskeleton
W   0    0.0     Extracellular structures
U   11    0.7     Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O   49    2.9     Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C   79    4.7     Energy production and conversion
G   79    4.7     Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E   73    4.4     Amino acid transport and metabolism
F   44    2.6     Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H   53    3.2     Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I   15    0.9     Lipid transport and metabolism
P   67    4.0     Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q   5    0.3     Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R   194    11.6     General function prediction only
S   116    7.0     Function unknown
-   575    34.5     Not in COGs

a) The total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome.

Comparison with the S. marinus genome

The genome of S. hellenicus is slightly larger than the genome of S. marinus (1.58 Mbp vs. 1.57 Mbp), and the number of protein-coding genes is also larger (1668 vs. 1610). However, the number of pseudogenes is also higher in S. hellenicus (69 vs. 40). Some of the COG categories show different numbers of genes between the two organisms. S. hellenicus has 25 additional genes that do not belong to COGs. S. hellenicus has greater numbers of genes involved in cell wall biogenesis (39 vs. 23), nucleotide transport and metabolism (44 vs. 39) and carbohydrate transport and metabolism (79 vs. 72), while S. marinus has greater numbers of genes in the categories of energy production and conversion (92 vs. 79) and inorganic ion transport and metabolism (85 vs. 67).

The genes involved in cell wall metabolism that are in S. hellenicus but not in S. marinus are genes involved in nucleotide-sugar metabolism and glycosyltransferases, suggesting that S. hellenicus may have a greater variety of sugars attached to glycolipids and glycoproteins. Most of the additional S. hellenicus genes are located within a region of fifty genes on the chromosome (Shell_0865-Shell_0915) that is not present in S. marinus. The additional genes in S. hellenicus involved in nucleotide metabolism include adenylosuccinate synthase, adenylosuccinate lyase, and GMP synthase. Both S. hellenicus and S. marinus lack de novo purine synthesis, but the presence of these three additional enzymes suggests that S. hellenicus may be able to synthesize AMP and GMP from IMP, while S. marinus is unable to do so. The additional genes in carbohydrate transport and metabolism include nucleotide-sugar modifying enzymes that were also included in cell wall metabolism, but they also include a probable β-1,4-endoglucanase (cellulase) from glycosyl hydrolase family 5.

The genes found in S. marinus but not in S. hellenicus belong to the categories of energy production and conversion, and inorganic ion transport and metabolism. They include proteins related to subunits of multisubunit cation:proton antiporters and proteins related to subunits of NADH dehydrogenase and formate hydrogen lyase. These proteins are similar to subunits of mbh, a multisubunit membrane-bound hydrogenase from Pyrococcus furiosus [35], and mbx, a multisubunit complex of unknown function that probably has a role in sulfur reduction, also from P. furiosus [36]. S. marinus has three operons related to mbh and mbx, while S. hellenicus has only one, suggesting that the three operons may be redundant in function in S. marinus. Since S. marinus and S. hellenicus lack other enzymes involved in sulfur reduction, it is possible that these mbh/mbx-related operons play a role in sulfur reduction in these organisms.

References
1. Arab H, Völker H, Thomm M. Thermococcus aegaeicus sp. nov. and Staphylothermus hellenicus sp. nov., two novel hyperthermophilic archaea isolated from geothermally heated vents off Palaeochori Bay, Milos, Greece. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:2101-2108. [doi:10.1099/00207713-50-6-2101] [pmid:11155985]
2. Anderson IJ, Dharmarajan L, Rodriguez J, Hooper S, Porat I, Ulrich LE, Elkins JG, Mavromatis K, Sun H, Land M, et al. The complete genome sequence of Staphylothermus marinus reveals differences in sulfur metabolism among heterotrophic Crenarchaeota. BMC Genomics 2009; 10:145. [doi:10.1186/1471-2164-10-145] [pmid:19341479]
3. Anderson IJ, Sun H, Lapidus A, Copeland A, Glavina Del Rio T, Tice H, Dalin E, Lucas S, Barry K, Land M, et al. Complete genome sequence of Staphylothermus marinus Stetter and Fiala 1986 type strain F1. Stand Genomic Sci 2009; 1:183-188. [doi:10.4056/sigs.30527] [pmid:21304655]
4. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 2000; 17:540-552. [pmid:10742046]
5. Lee C, Grasso C, Sharlow MF. Multiple sequence alignment using partial order graphs. Bioinformatics 2002; 18:452-464. [doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.452] [pmid:11934745]
6. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst Biol 2008; 57:758-771. [doi:10.1080/10635150802429642] [pmid:18853362]
7. Hess PN, De Moraes Russo CA. An empirical test of the midpoint rooting method. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 2007; 92:669-674. [doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00864.x]
8. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? J Comput Biol 2010; 17:337-354. [doi:10.1089/cmb.2009.0179] [pmid:20377449]
9. Swofford DL. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0 b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, 2002.
10. Liolios K, Chen IM, Mavromatis K, Tavernarakis N, Hugenholtz P, Markowitz VM, Kyrpides NC. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:D346-D354. [doi:10.1093/nar/gkp848] [pmid:19914934]
11. Stetter KO, König H, Stackebrandt E. Pyrodictium gen. nov., a new genus of submarine disc-shaped sulfur reducing archaebacteria growing optimally at 105°C. Syst Appl Microbiol 1983; 4:535-551.
12. Fiala G, Stetter KO, Jannasch HW, Langworthy TA, Madon J. Staphylothermus marinus sp. nov. represents a novel genus of extremely thermophilic submarine heterotrophic archaebacteria growing up to 98°C. Syst Appl Microbiol 1986; 8:106-113.
13. Field D, Garrity G, Gray T, Morrison N, Selengut J, Sterk P, Tatusova T, Thomson N, Allen MJ, Angiuoli SV, et al. The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:541-547. [doi:10.1038/nbt1360] [pmid:18464787]
14. Woese CR, Kandler O, Wheelis ML. Towards a natural system of organisms: proposal for the domains Archaea, Bacteria, and Eucarya. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87:4576-4579. [doi:10.1073/pnas.87.12.4576] [pmid:2112744]
15. Garrity GM, Holt JG. Phylum AI. Crenarchaeota phy. nov. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1. 2nd ed. Edited by: Garrity GM, Boone DR and Castenholz RW. Springer, New York 2001: 169-210.
16. List Editor. Validation of publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSEM. Validation List no. 85. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:685-690. [doi:10.1099/ijs.0.02358-0] [pmid:12054225]
17. Reysenbach AL. Class I. Thermoprotei class. nov. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1. 2nd ed. Edited by: Garrity GM, Boone DR, and Castenholz RW. Springer, New York; 2001: 169.
18. Huber H, Stetter O. Order II. Desulfurococcales ord. nov. In: Garrity GM, Boone DR, Castenholz RW (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, Second Edition, Volume 1, Springer, New York, 2001, p. 179-180.
19. Burggraf S, Huber H, Stetter KO. Reclassification of the crenarchael orders and families in accordance with 16S rRNA sequence data. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:657-660. [doi:10.1099/00207713-47-3-657] [pmid:9226896]
20. Zillig W, Stetter KO, Prangishvilli D, Schäfer W, Wunderl S, Janekovic D, Holz I, Palm P. Desulfurococcaceae, the second family of the extremely thermophilic, anaerobic, sulfur-respiring Thermoproteales. Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infektioskr Hyg Abt 1 Orig 1982; 3:304-317.
21. List Editor. Validation List no. 10. Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1983; 33:438-440. [doi:10.1099/00207713-33-2-438]
22. List Editor. Validation List no. 22. Validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1986; 36:573-576. [doi:10.1099/00207713-36-4-573]
23. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, Davis AP, Dolinski K, Dwight SS, Eppig JT, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000; 25:25-29. [doi:10.1038/75556] [pmid:10802651]
24. Zerbino DR, Birney E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res 2008; 18:821-829. [doi:10.1101/gr.074492.107] [pmid:18349386]
25. Ewing B, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probablilities. Genome Res 1998; 8:186-194. [pmid:9521922]
26. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 1998; 8:175-185. [pmid:9521921]
27. Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res 1998; 8:195-202. [pmid:9521923]
28. Han C, Chain P. Finishing repeat regions automatically with Dupfinisher. In Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on bioinformatics and computational biology, ed. Arabnia HR, Valafar H. CSREA Press, 2006:141-146.
29. Hyatt D, Chen GL, Lacascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:119. [doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-119] [pmid:20211023]
30. Pati A, Ivanova NN, Mikhailova N, Ovchinnikova G, Hooper SD, Lykidis A, Kyrpides NC. GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Methods 2010; 7:455-457. [doi:10.1038/nmeth.1457] [pmid:20436475]
31. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:955-964. [doi:10.1093/nar/25.5.955] [pmid:9023104]
32. INFERNAL. Inference of RNA alignments. http://infernal.janelia.org
33. The Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) platform. http://img.jgi.doe.gov
34. Markowitz VM, Mavromatis K, Ivanova NN, Chen IMA, Chu K, Kyrpides NC. IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics 2009; 25:2271-2278. [doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393] [pmid:19561336]
35. Silva PJ, van den Ban EC, Wassink H, Haaker H, de Castro B, Robb FT, Hagen WR. Enzymes of hydrogen metabolism in Pyrococcus furiosus. Eur J Biochem 2000; 267:6541-6551. [doi:10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01745.x] [pmid:11054105]
36. Schut GJ, Bridger SL, Adams MWW. Insights into the metabolism of elemental sulfur by the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus: characterization of a coenzyme A-dependent NAD(P)H sulfur oxidoreductase. J Bacteriol 2007; 189:4431-4441. [doi:10.1128/JB.00031-07] [pmid:17449625]


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Acknowledgements

We would like to gratefully acknowledge the support of many members of the Genomic Standards Consortium, the broader genomic science community, and those who have indicated their willingness to serve as editors, reviewers and contributors.

Funding for SIGS is provided by a grant from the Office of the Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies at Michigan State University, the Michigan State University Foundation, and the US Department of Energy Biological and Environmental Research DE-FG02-08ER64707.

Standards in Genomic Sciences is indexed in:

Sponsors of the Genomic Standards Consortium: